It is no secret that
dogs have a pristine sense of smell; perhaps that is why dogs are used for drug
sniffing searches. Just the state of Florida alone has over a 1,000 canine units,
and due to these units the police departments have been able to make over
130,000 arrests this last year. Although, through the success, there have been
many cases were the dogs have been wrong or have wrongly detected.
On Wednesday, two cases
originating from Florida will be judged by the United States Supreme Court on
whether a canine’s alert will be enough reasonable evidence for a search
warrant. American citizens are protected by the fourth amendment which places a
ban on any unreasonable searches so evidence is important. Some people say that
“there needs to be caution against using canines in place of search warrants.”
One person even went as far as to suggest that “A dog and his handler must be
tested on multiple vehicles, and they need to be correct nine out of 10 times.
Over two days a study
was done by researches from UC Davis that experimented with the dogs and their
ability to detect drugs. The experiment started off by informing 18 “dog
handlers” about miniature samples of illegal drugs marked with a red piece of construction
paper that were placed in four rooms of the church building. Through the
testing the drug-sniffing dogs warned their police handlers multiple times, 255
times over all to be exact, for every room in the building. Examiners detected
that the dogs were twice more likely to warn the police officers when there was
a spot marked with a piece of red construction paper when in fact there were no
drugs in any of the rooms. The data suggests that the dogs are triggered by the
suspicion of the “handler’s beliefs” showing that the dogs in some cases are
not completely reliable. In the previous year the Chicago Tribune found that
out of all the drug searches conducted on peoples cars, only 44 percent of them
were successful. The study emphasizes the need to rely on other evidence in
order to conduct a search, but the decision will be up to the United States
Supreme Court.
No comments:
Post a Comment